Statistics are shown for this demographic
Parish
Response rates from 1.3k LS1 4 voters.
8% Yes |
92% No |
4% Yes |
89% No |
4% Yes, replace it with a bill of rights that gives the UK more legislative control |
4% No, but criminals should lose many of these rights |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 1.3k LS1 4 voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 1.3k LS1 4 voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from LS1 4 voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9FRFHMS2yrs2Y
Yes, but replace it with a reformed version codified and agree by referendum and parliament vote and blocked from being removed or amended by parliament without another referendum
@4VNQ2BS5yrs5Y
No, but criminals should lose rights depending on the severity of their crime/crimes.
@9N33YJV1yr1Y
Only for people who committed crimes against children, rape or sexual assault or any other crime that can fall under this category
@8JYNF9P5yrs5Y
People who have committed crimes inflicted on children and vulnerable people, such as sex crimes, homicide, etc, should loose these rights.
@8GHCTYY5yrs5Y
The question is far too broad to answer accurately.
@B57QRVX1mo1MO
It definitely needs reviewing as it is being abused in certain situations. People who premeditate to torture and hurt other human beings need their rights reducing after a fair trial.
@9RR2JLY10mos10MO
Yes, it should be layered. The HRA has been taken advantage of by non-citizens. Not every person who steps on our soil should be afforded the same rights
Join in on the most popular conversations.
