+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 408 M1 1 voters.

66%
Yes
27%
No
58%
Yes
16%
No
8%
Yes, and with proportional representation
8%
No, but remove hereditary peers and bishops
3%
No, appointed members provide stability and progress instead of political deadlock

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 408 M1 1 voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 408 M1 1 voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from M1 1 voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9JBZT7N answered…1yr1Y

No, but I think it should be reformed, not have inheritable titles, and be made up in experts of all fields to assess efficacy of laws passed in the commons.

 @B57RCDCanswered…1mo1MO

I would have a three chamber parliament. The upper chamber would be selected by the regions/nations by whatever method they choose (equal numbers of representatives from each without concern for population). They would serve for 15 years and never again.

 @B47QX6Sanswered…3mos3MO

It should be a house of experts appointed by their peers from important fields in the uk like the nhs or police.

 @B2LKX3Qanswered…4mos4MO

A second chamber should be economic, with representatives of different industries elected by trade unions

 @9Z9KQ6K  from Maine  answered…6mos6MO

Yes, the house of lords should be a body based on academic knowledge to act as a balance to the house of commons

 @9Z9KQ6K  from Maine  answered…6mos6MO

Yes, the house of lords should be a body based academic knowledge to act as a balance to the house of commons

OSZAR »