+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 127k UK voters.

61%
Yes
32%
No
53%
Yes
21%
No
8%
Yes, and with proportional representation
8%
No, but remove hereditary peers and bishops
4%
No, appointed members provide stability and progress instead of political deadlock

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 127k UK voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 127k UK voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from UK voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9JBZT7N answered…1yr1Y

No, but I think it should be reformed, not have inheritable titles, and be made up in experts of all fields to assess efficacy of laws passed in the commons.

 @B57RCDCanswered…3wks3W

I would have a three chamber parliament. The upper chamber would be selected by the regions/nations by whatever method they choose (equal numbers of representatives from each without concern for population). They would serve for 15 years and never again.

 @B47QX6Sanswered…2mos2MO

It should be a house of experts appointed by their peers from important fields in the uk like the nhs or police.

 @B2LKX3Qanswered…4mos4MO

A second chamber should be economic, with representatives of different industries elected by trade unions

 @9Z9KQ6K  from Maine  answered…5mos5MO

Yes, the house of lords should be a body based on academic knowledge to act as a balance to the house of commons

 @9Z9KQ6K  from Maine  answered…5mos5MO

Yes, the house of lords should be a body based academic knowledge to act as a balance to the house of commons

OSZAR »